Cookie Monster, Social Influence & Crowdsourcing

Tweets about watching a Cookie Monster audition video to help him land a gig hosting SNL started showing up in my Twitter stream this week. While I typically tweet about things like old and new media, public relations, and Montessori, I couldn’t resist retweeting the plea. Yes, you read that right. A Montessori mom who doesn’t let her 3-year-old watch television, including Sesame Street, was one of the people who helped Cookie Monster’s video reach 1 million views today after just four days online.

Upon reflection, I realize I did it because Sesame Street’s Cookie Monster SNL campaign (there’s also a new Cookie Monster Facebook page that has garnered almost 100,000 “likes” in four days) is cute, funny, and irresistable—an excellent example of using social media and crowdsourcing to help elevate a brand.

Crowdsourcing is leveraging the power of a crowd to accomplish amazing things, and it is changing the nature of research, writing, innovation, disaster relief, and fundraising to name a few. The Cookie Monster SNL campaign is actually a form of crowd voting, one of four crowdsourcing flavors:

  • Crowd voting leverages a community’s judgment to organize, filter, rank, or lobby for a cause, product, or type of content (i.e., music, movies, etc.). Another great example of crowd voting is the Pepsi Refresh Project, an effort by the makers of Pepsi to use crowdsourcing for social good (and elevating its brand). Pepsi has been giving away $1.3 million every month this year to the ideas Americans select as the best in online voting. 
  • Crowd wisdom is using the collective opinion of a group of individuals to solve a problem, predict future outcomes, write or translate articles, or help direct corporate strategy. One of the best examples of this type of crowdsourcing is Ushahidi, an activist mapping tool collecting eyewitness reports sent in by e-mail and text message. Ushahidi’s maps were the heros of the Haitian and Chilean earthquakes, helping relief workers save thousands of lives.
  • Crowd creation is tapping into the creative powers of a group of individuals to create original works of knowledge or art. Director Tim Burton is currently using crowd creation via Twitter to create a new story for his Stainboy character. From now until December 6, the best storylines tweeted to Burton’s @burtonstory Twitter account will be used in his new script.
  • Crowd funding pools the money of many individuals to fund a project, organization, or effort. A great example of crowdfunding is Kiva, a microlending website helping aspiring entrepreneurs in developing countries find financing for their projects.

Will crowdsourcing land Cookie Monster a spot on SNL. Maybe? A Facebook campaign worked to help land Betty White a hosting spot on SNL earlier this year. All the hype paid off big for NBC too.  White’s hosting turn drew in 12.1 million viewers, SNL‘s highest rating in 18 months.

Do you think Cookie Monster is a crowdsourcing genius? Please share you thoughts in the comments section below.

Tweeted & Deleted: Dodd’s ‘Technical Mistake’

Twitter followers of retiring Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) got a surprising tweet from him last Thursday morning.

“U love torturing me w this shit.” was tweeted from the Senator’s Twitter account @SenChrisDodd. Then came the tweet “From Dodd Staff – Apologies to Dodd’s followers, last tweet was not from Chris Dodd.”

The first tweet has quickly deleted but not before some of his followers took screenshots and sent out comical tweets about it.  Later in the day, Senator Dodd’s office released a statement addressing the tweet.

“Due to a technical mistake, a message was inadvertently sent from Senator Dodd’s twitter account. Senator Dodd did not send the message. We have corrected the situation and apologize to his followers for the mistake and inappropriate language used in the message.”

I’ve written before about the dangers of assigning a junior staff member or intern to manage your organization’s social media. You would never let junior staffers do a live interview on television, so why let them near your Twitter account, especially if they haven’t been thoroughly trained? Since Senator Dodd is retiring soon, the answer in his case could be a temporary change in duties as his office winds down.

What’s the lesson learned? Never take social media assignments and training lightly, even temporarily, or you risk making a fool out of yourself all over the Internet.

What lesson do you think we can learn from Senator Dodd’s “technical mistake?” Please share your ideas in the comments section below.

Brokaw: ‘I Don’t Get Twitter…Just Stuff That Fills Air’

I read an interesting PoynterOnline blog post today about Tom Brokaw, former anchor of “NBC Nightly News.” Apparently, Brokaw doesn’t get Twitter and isn’t interested in trying it out.

“As for Twitter? He doesn’t believe it’s taken form yet journalistically. ‘I don’t get Twitter,’ Brokaw said. ‘I know that it’s very popular and that it’s a quick way of getting a text blast out, so to speak, but an awful lot of it seems to be … just stuff that fills air.'”

Ironically, today I also read that Nancy Pelosi used Twitter to tell the world she is running for House Minority Leader. As I’ve written about before, politicians and institutions, such as the Pentagon, are increasingly achieving global media coverage without press releases, news conferences, or even a single interview with a reporter. Not only does news sources’ use of Twitter make it relevant, it makes Twitter a major competition to the mainstream media as a real-time delivery method for news.

At the end of the PoytnerOnline post, Brokaw gave advice to today’s journalists, such as never turning down an assignment.

“If I went, I always found something happened,” Brokaw said. “There’s always a reason to turn over a rock and find out what’s under it.”

Ironically again, Brokaw’s rock analogy is perfect advice for today’s journalists (and business people) on why they should be using Twitter.

Do you agree? Or do you think Twitter is just “stuff that fills the air too.” Please share your opinion in the comments section below.

Video Clip of the Month: KFC Pinkwashing Parody

My November 2010 video clip of the month is an oldie but goodie. It’s a parody of last spring’s “Buckets for the Cure” fundraising partnership between KFC and Susan G. Komen for the Cure. The low-tech, cheaply produced parody video, by Greg and Lou, a New York City comedy duo, received 10,795 hits on YouTube as of Nov. 1, 2010. This is more than both of KFC’s high-tech and presumably expensive-to-produce “Buckets for the Cure” campaign videos: KFC Employees Do the Pink Bucket (8,893) and KFC Restaurant Painted Pink for “Buckets for the Cure” (9,892).

I picked the video because it is a warning to brands that if money ever clouds their values, goals, or common sense, the Web 2.0 world will quickly and cheaply point it out to the universe. Not only did the Komen/KFC debacle generate several counter videos on YouTube, it also generated a ton of bad press, mocking blog posts, and sarcastic tweets:

  • Ultimate “do the ends really justify the means?”: selling KFC (FRIED CHICKEN) to raise money for breast cancer?! U can’t make this shit up
  • What the Cluck? Tell KFC and Susan G. Komen for the Cure to stop pinkwashing!
  • Wait, so you buy a bucket of KFC to fight breast cancer? What do you buy to fight obesity and heart disease?
  • Boycott Kentucky Fried Chicken For Pinkwashing! http://deceiver.com/2010/04/26/kfc-battles-breast-cancer-wtih-carcinogenic-fried-foods/

Even without Web 2.0, the possibility of the campaign backfiring and hurting KFC and Komen’s credibility should have been obvious.  Komen’s own website addresses the link between obesity (which high fat fast foods contribute to) and breast cancer. Only a “Puffs for the Cure” partnership with Marlboro Cigarettes could have been worse.

What’s your take on the Komen-KFC deal? Please share your thoughts below.

Replacing Silos with Hives: Creating a Social Culture

This week I ran across a Geoff Livingston post with a brilliant bee metaphor explaining how organizations need to create a social culture to exploit social media’s full potential (readers of my blog know I love social media bee metaphors):

“The basic nest architecture for all honey bees is similar: ‘Honey is stored in the upper part of the comb; beneath it are rows of pollen-storage cells, worker-brood cells, and drone-brood cells, in that order. The peanut-shaped queen cells are normally built at the lower edge of the comb.’

“Hives are adjacent to each other, and while their members each have roles, from products (honey) and defenders to mates and rulers, these hives allow for fluid interaction. This a much different mindset than a traditional corporate architecture of silos. A hive architecture allows for fluid information transfer and interaction between roles, as well as more open access to the outside,” he wrote.

This is a very important topic because all too often an organization’s senior leadership doesn’t fully understand or appreciate what social media is all about, leading them to assign a junior staff person or intern to manage it. Without the attention of senior leadership across “silos,” these efforts usually flounder because they fail to spark authentic conversation; lack an organization-wide strategic focus; and often overuse cheesy “push”  marketing, undermining trust in the organization’s brand.

Here are five crucial steps to tap the power of your staff members’ collective engagement in social media: 

1. Create an integrated social media strategy.  Start with a plan to coordinate your social media efforts across your organization—marketing, customer service, public relations, web content/search engine optimization (SEO), human resources, etc.—so you are speaking with one voice, working efficiently, and not sending out mixed messages. Make sure your strategy enables content to be updated quickly, allowing for live conversations, and focuses on your organization’s communications needs, not the latest tools.

2. Develop social media guidelines. For your staff members to tweet or blog without fear, they need social media guidelines to know what they can and cannot do.  These guidelines should define your expectations, encourage social media problem-solving, and spell out what they must avoid in both personal and professional status updates.

3. Allow staff members to listen. To avoid having staff members talk at people about your brand, product or service (and turn them off), you need to allot them enough time to listen and orient themselves online before diving in. Through listening, they will understand the nuances of each conversation channel, who the thought leaders are, what people are talking about, and what interests or concerns them. Only then can they engage people authentically, putting people’s needs and interests first (using a pull, not push, marketing approach) in support of your organization’s communications needs.

4. Reward staff members for communicating. Create incentives, such as contests, prizes, and encouragement from senior leadership.

5. Share what is and isn’t working.  Track the time staff members are spending on social media tasks and constantly benchmark this data against the progress your organization is making toward your communications objectives. Keep staff members informed about these results and seek their input on best practices and course corrections.

What are your thoughts? Do you think social media is best left to interns? Please leave your comments below.